「ã“ã®ã€Œã‚¤ãƒ³ãƒ•レ税ã€ã€‚本æ¥ã¯ç©æ¥µè²¡æ”¿ã«ã‚ˆã£ã¦çµŒæ¸ˆãŒæˆé•·ã€æ‰€å¾—増ã¨éœ€è¦å¢—ã«ã‚ˆã‚‹è‰¯ã„インフレ(ディマンドプルインフレ)ã§èµ·ãる事を想定ã—ãŸã‚‚ã®ã€‚ãれãŒå††å®‰ãªã©ã«ã‚ˆã‚‹æ‚ªã„インフレ(コストプッシュインフレ)ã§ç™ºç”Ÿã—ã¦ã„る訳ã§ã€çµŒæ¸ˆæˆé•·ã‚‚ã›ãšã€æ‰€å¾—も増ãˆãªã„中ã€å›½æ°‘ã¯ç‰©ä¾¡é«˜é¨°ã¨å¾´ç¨Žã®Wパンãƒã‚’食らã£ã¦ã„ã‚‹ã ã‘。ã¤ã¾ã‚Šé«˜å¸‚ã¯ã‚¤ãƒ³ãƒ•ãƒ¬ç¨Žåˆ†ã‚’è»æ‹¡ãªã©ã«å……ã¦ãšã€å…¨ã¦æ¸›ç¨Žã§å›½æ°‘ã«è¿”é‚„ã™ã¹ããªã®ã ã€‚〠インフレæŒç¶šã§å›½åº«ã«å…¥ã‚‹ã€Œã‚¤ãƒ³ãƒ•レ税90兆円ã€ã‚’財政拡張ã®è²¡æºã«ã™ã‚‹é«˜å¸‚æ° image 「ã“れ本当ãã†ã ã¨æ€ã†ã‚ˆ ãƒã‚«å¸‚ブレーンã®ãƒ–ルガリ洋一㌠円安ã«ãªã‚Œã°å¤–貨準備金ãªã©ãŒç‚ºæ›¿å·®ç›ŠãŒå‡ºã‚‹ã‹ã‚‰ã€Œãã®åˆ†å›½æ°‘ã«è¿”ã›ã°èª°ã‚‚æ–‡å¥è¨€ã‚ãªã„ã€ã¨è¨€ã£ã¦ãŸãŒ 円安ã®ã‚³ã‚¹ãƒˆãƒ—ッシュインフレã ã‘å›½æ°‘ã«æŠ¼ã—付ã‘ã¦ã€è»æ‹¡ã‚„税åŽå¢—ãˆãŸã ã‘ã§å›½æ°‘ã«ä¸€åˆ‡é‚„å…ƒã—ãªã„クソ自民政府 ãã‚Œå‡¦ã‹æ‰€å¾—税増税や為替差益ã®ãƒ‰ãƒ«ã®åˆ©ç›Šã‚‚トランプã«è²¢ã始末 最åˆã‹ã‚‰ã“ã„ã¤ç­‰å›½æ°‘ã«é‚„å…ƒã™ã‚‹è¨³ç„¡ã„ã¨æ‰¹åˆ¤ã—ã¦ãŸãŒãã®é€šã‚Šã«ãªã£ãŸã‚„ã‚?ã€
It is necessary to understand Kaczynski’s distinct constellation of concepts in order to appreciate the ideological distinctness of ITS. The group uses his signature vocabulary: the technological system, the power process, surrogate activities, leftism, feelings of inferiority, oversocialization, etc. This is not the vocabulary of radical environmentalism or green anarchism. With the exceptions of ‘civilization’ and ‘domination’, ITS explicitly rejects the ‘leftist’ vocabulary of anarchism: oppression, solidarity, mutual aid, class struggle, hierarchy, inequality, injustice, and imperialism. Further, as I have already shown, even the ‘green’ parts of ITS’s communiqués have been filtered through Kaczynski. ITS is not an eco-terrorist or green anarchist group, but a novel kind of anti-tech terrorist group. The group’s ideology is distinctly Kaczynskian, genealogically and morphologically. The modus operandi of ITS is not typical of radical environmentalists or green anarchists, who tend to be saboteurs or ‘monkeywrenchers’. Environmental radicals almost always target property rather than people. ITS, on the other hand, declares that it ‘is not a group of saboteurs (we do not share the strategy of sabotage or damage or destruction of property)’. Instead, as Kaczynski did, ITS aims to kill or maim people, such as scientists, whose surrogate activities propel the development of the technological system.
🆕 WSJ: торговую компанию Jane Street обвинили в инÑайдерÑкой торговле, ÐºÐ¾Ñ‚Ð¾Ñ€Ð°Ñ ÑпоÑобÑтвовала краху Terraform Labs #LUNA #crypto #blockchain
Israeli occupation forces deliberately storm Palestinian homes past midnight and force families out in the city of Nablus in the occupied West Bank.
Será que tem um Bitcoin enterrado no deserto? Em 2018, um milionário espanhol enterrou um trezor com 1 BTC no Saara e publicou coordenadas erradas. Ele diz que quer criar "a primeira caça ao tesouro digital da história". E que o biticoin é o futuro dos contratos inteligentes. -->seraverdade?
image You’ve heard the saying: “The left hand doesn’t know what the right hand is doing.†That’s not just office gossip. That’s how fiat monetary systems often function. Central banks set interest rates. Treasuries run deficits. Commercial banks expand credit. Regulators tighten capital rules. Each arm is rational within its silo. But nobody owns the whole feedback loop. Rates get cut to stimulate growth. Cheap credit flows into property. Asset prices inflate. Regulators respond with capital buffers. Banks optimise around the rules. Governments borrow more because debt is cheap. From the inside, every decision looks logical. From the outside, you get distortion. Housing runs ahead of wages. Productive lending gets crowded out. Working capital shrinks. Balance sheets expand. It’s not incompetence. It’s fragmented incentive architecture. Too many hands on the machine. No single view of the dashboard. Now compare that to Bitcoin. There is no monetary committee. No discretionary rate setting. No “temporary†emergency program. Issuance is fixed. Supply is transparent. Rules are visible. Verification is decentralised. Every participant sees the same ledger. Every participant enforces the same rules. It’s not “left hand vs right hand.†It’s all hands on deck — validating the same system. Fiat runs on delegated trust and human discretion. Bitcoin runs on deterministic coordination. In business terms: Fiat is a multi-division conglomerate with misaligned KPIs. Bitcoin is a protocol with one balance sheet and no executive override. You can argue flexibility vs rigidity. But you can’t argue clarity. And in volatile markets, clarity is leverage. That’s the real distinction. Not ideology. Architecture. #Bitcoin #Macroeconomics #Liquidity #CapitalFlows #SystemDesign #FinancialArchitecture
Stats: - payments: 450 - paymentsHour: 0 - wallets: 23 - walletsHour: 0 - totalBalance: 44151048 - totalFeeCredit: 117611 - serviceBalance: 23027000
Block 938033 3 - high priority 1 - medium priority 1 - low priority 1 - no priority 1 - purging #bitcoinfees #mempool
Block 938033 3 - high priority 1 - medium priority 1 - low priority 1 - no priority 1 - purging #bitcoinfees #mempool
Block 938033 3 - high priority 1 - medium priority 1 - low priority 1 - no priority 1 - purging #bitcoinfees #mempool
A Substack post about an AI thought experiment was linked to a stock market selloff as some Wall Street traders reacted to fears that AI could disrupt major companies.
Mon - Feb 23 - 03:30 PM - PST // bit.site â˜¹ï¸ Error connecting to node-1.ipfs.bit.site 4001 - [Errno -2] Name or service not known // pinnable.xyz ✅ Connection successful: 167.71.172.216 4001 â˜¹ï¸ Error connecting to 188.166.180.196 4001 - [Errno 111] Connection refused ✅ Connection successful: 143.198.18.166 4001 // 4everland.io ✅ Connection successful: node-1.ipfs.4everland.net 4001
↑